Lab+3

 I strongly believe that the Ipad is not revolutionary. The word ‘revolutionary’ means changing ways of doing a task in an innovative way. Apple is the most advanced and intelligent software creator and have great contribution to the art and design world. Their ingenious inventions include the ipod, imac, and ibook, etc. When it comes to the ipad, I simply could not apply the word revolutionary to describe it.
 * CCT205 - LAB 3 **
 * IS THE 'IPAD' REVOLUTIONARY? **

The design of the ipad is the same as an ipod touch, except larger. Not to mention, the features are also the same. This means you cannot multitask on it. The battery life only last 10 hours, while netbooks can last much longer. The browse does not have Flash which conflicts with how certain websites loads. Regarding the cost, the most expensive model is $829 USD, with this amount a person is able to invest into a much better computer. Further more, you need to purchase extra adapters for USB ports.

This technology of ipad is nothing new. It is rather an upgraded version of the old. This is not a revolution; it is just a cycle to renew the old to a different version. Ipad would be placed in a new category, but never revolutionary.